arXiv.org: free online repository of 2 million research articles
Over the past two years, lay scholars and other lay people have read references to “bioRxiv” and “medRxiv” in reports on the Covid-19 pandemic, frequently described as “preprint servers.”
bioRxiv and medRxiv, which have played an invaluable role in rapidly disseminating the findings of scientific research on the coronavirus to physicians, scientists and health decision-makers around the world, were inspired by arXiv.org, the original preprint server that published its two millionth paper – a numerical analysis titled “Refined Iterations and the Wrapping Effect: Various Approaches” – earlier this month.
arXiv – pronounced “archive” because the “X” stands for “chi”, the 22nd letter of the Greek alphabet – is a gigantic online repository of research that physicists, astronomers, computer scientists and mathematicians, among others, find indispensable.
For over 30 years
arXiv “started out in 1989 as a mailing list for a few dozen string theorists,” according to a long profile published Jan. 10 in Scientific American magazine. In 1991, physicist Paul Ginsparg, then a member of the technical staff at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, automated his colleague Joanne Cohn’s email list, turning it into a repository that anyone can access or submit to. , indicates the article.
Thus was born arXiv, to which up to 500,000 articles were submitted in 2008. It took only six years until 2014 for that number to double to one million, and seven more years to double again.
Ginsparg is now at Cornell University, where arXiv is also legally located. Cohn, whose string theory manuscript exchange seeded the idea for arXiv, is at UC Berkeley.
Fast and Free
Although the material published on arXiv is not peer reviewed, it allows the wider community of researchers to circulate their findings quickly and freely while awaiting peer review. Research could appear online within a day of submission, compared to perhaps several months in traditional journals. This is also true for the life science preprint servers bioRxiv and medRxiv – and has made an immense contribution to accelerating biomedical research in the literally life-and-death situation of the pandemic.
“It’s like the backbone of our field,” said the Scientific American article quoting Alex Kohls, head of CERN’s Scientific Information Service. “It is not only a tool for physicists and computer scientists, it has had an impact on the overall process of scholarly communication. “
Scientific American cited the work of Lanu Kim, who led a study that found that authors of highly cited arXiv articles were increasingly likely not to publish at all in a mainstream journal. Kim’s team, according to the article, found that journals still had a significant impact on citations, but now looked more like curators than major research distributors.
But there are also problems. arXiv acknowledges the support of the New York-based Simons Foundation and a large number of academic and research institutions around the world, but is still under-resourced. A small, paid team helps volunteer moderators manage up to 1,200 submissions each day, according to the Scientific American article. “We are under staff and underfund – and have been for years,” the article quoted Steinn Sigurdsson, scientific director of arXiv.
The article also raised concerns about some of arXiv’s moderation policies, citing, among others, physicist Deepak Vaid of the Karnataka National Institute of Technology, Surathkal: “They are taking steps that appear to go against the grain. of what the role of a preprint server should be. “Dr Vaid, according to the article, pointed to” inconsistent moderation and a lack of transparency. “
Newsletter | Click for the best explanations of the day to your inbox